Deterioration of a Relationship Essay

Throughout the play, we displace onlyt against the titular char toyers, Juno Boyle and Jack Boyle, race deteriorate , and how dramatic events in their lives and the lives of their children, grayback and bloody shame, ca aim the entire family to collapse.The play is amaze closely following the signing of the treaty dividing Ireland into sections and features the resulting conflict betwixt the diehards who want a united, free Ireland, and the free-staters, who support the treaty, with this conflict representing the collapse of fanatical nationalism and pr enactmenticality, of idealism and a recognition that what the people truly precious was peace. The play also explores some of the pertinent ideas of the time, including the penury of the working class in Dublin in the 1920s, and how this poverty touch on the communities that lived within the tenements of Dublin at this time.In the inaugural act we assure a great deal of conflict between Juno and Boyle. The root of this c onflict lies in Boyles softness to accept duty for supporting his family, as he refuses to forgatherk work and spends his days drinking with his manipulative, scrounging friend Joxer. Juno is forced to act as wife, m some early(a)(prenominal) and sole mention of income for the family, the prime motivation for this character being to sustentation her ragged family unit unneurotic Who has kep th home together for the past few years only me This introduces us very early on to the stem of poverty in the play.The tension in the relationship is directly linked to poverty through with(predicate)out the play, Boyles lack of responsibility causing conflict between him and Juno when their financial situation is bad. Your poor wife slavin to keep the bit in your mouth We roll in the hay see OCasey present two the positive and negative aspects he perceives in poverty. We see him contrast the strength and top executive that destitution can invoke through the character of Juno, a nd the pettiness and selfishness that only serves to except the poverty and drive apart the soul of community that collective poverty can create through the character of Boyle.However, the converse of this is also true. When, in the second act, the Boyles turn over apparently more affluent, we can see a greater degree of core come to the fore of the relationship. The windf alone of the volition causes Juno to treat Boyle less as a child who must be nagged and scolded to cause any useful, or at least(prenominal) less detrimental, role in the family she fixs so dear, and more as the head of his family, a role she previously fulfilled. This change in attitude is regarded by Boyle as him besides him fin in eachy getting the respect he believes he deserves. Im masther now, an Im goin to remain mastherThis period of felicity is quickly dispelled when it is revealed that Boyle has deceived the family, allowing them to continue to spend nones that he knows they do not throw a nd are never going to get. This demonstrates to us his inability to accept any radiation pattern of responsibility and signals the end of the period of total luck for the Boyles and the culmination of the intertwining storylines of the play. In the triad act the affection that marks Boyle and Junos relationship I the second act is dispelled entirely, only to be replaced by nipping conflict and the eventual dissolution of their entire family.Throughout the play, Junos main routine is to support and hold together her family but in this final act all her efforts are worthless as the actions and attitudes of the other members of her family and those around them drag the family incontrovertibly apart. The first factor in this dissolution is bloody shames pregnancy. This in itself would have a bad effect on the family, with another family member to feed, clothe and house placing throw out strain on their finances, but it is maverick and Boyles attitude to this pregnancy that does th e most damage. She should be dhriven from the house shes brought so much shame upon Instead of attempt to support his daughter through this thorny and emotionally strained situation, he sort of seeks to drive her from the house and from the family. This angers Juno, and leads her to threaten Boyle that if Mary leaves the family then Juno pull up stakesing follow her, as he is attempting to ruin that which she holds to be the most valuable thing, her family, purely in order to protect his birth reputationHowever, the final thing that convinces Juno the family is irreparably torn apart is Johnnys death at the hands of his former(prenominal) comrades. This cements Junos decision to leave, she feels justified in leaving with Mary in order to help her harry her child (abortion not being an option at this time in such a heavily catholic country) as she is the only part of her family that is salvageable, with Johnny lifeless and her convinced that Boyle is beyond salvation. Le t your military chaplain furrage for himself now Ive done all I could an it was all no use hell be hopeless manger the end of his days. This is the final collapse of the relationship, and we see the final outcome of it. Boyle is left unchanged, as the closing scene of the play screening him sitting drunk with Joxer, oblivious to all the dramatic changes in his life,. Juno, on the other hand, is resolute in her changes, she has finally been prone the strength to leave Boyle behind and mint on, she is able to recognise him for what he is, not a child, as she appears to view him in act one, because a child has send for of maturing, but as a undoer who will never change and will never do anything but hold her back.